-
-
-
-
Berg, Dag Erik & Bråthen, Svein
(2022).
Prinsippløst forslag om skolepenger.
Romsdals Budstikke..
ISSN 0806-5160.
-
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2022).
"Gandhi’s concept of non-violence and the Mardøla struggle".
-
-
-
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2021).
Ikke-vold, Gandhi og Mardalsfossen.
Romsdals Budstikke..
ISSN 0806-5160.
p. 26–27.
-
-
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2020).
Ambedkar’s radical moves beyond Dewey’s pragmatism.
Countercurrents.org.
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2020).
Studying caste, race and nation today:
law, hegemony and the ontological drive
.
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2020).
Steps towards a critical explanation of caste and law: domination, political ethnography, interpretation.
-
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2020).
Book talk: Dynamics of Caste and Law: Dalits, Oppression and Constitutional Democracy in India.
-
-
Berg, Dag-Erik & Pettersson, Petter Haakon
(2020).
Trump har beredet grunnen for andre autoritære ledere.
[Newspaper].
Romsdals Budstikke.
-
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2020).
Slik undergraver demagogene demokratiet.
Romsdals Budstikke..
ISSN 0806-5160.
-
-
-
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2017).
Kastestigma, daliter og Indias kvoteringspolitikk.
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2017).
Graded inequality in international perspective : caste, inequality, slavery.
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2017).
Human rights struggle in Jammu and Kashmir.
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2017).
Race as a political frontier against caste in international human rights politics: Dalits, India’s foreign policy and the UN.
Show summary
The concept of race has been central to attempts of decolonising knowledge and European categories of thought, but the question of caste in India has not yet been brought into the social sciences and the global approach to racism and exclusion. The aim of this presentation is to explain how anthropological definitions of race could exclude caste in international law. The controversy over caste and race in India’s foreign policy at the time of the Word Conference against Racism in Durban South Africa in 2001 gives insights into how race could be defined to keep caste-based discrimination away from international human rights law. India’s foreign policy in WCAR was supported by sociologists who defined race as a matter of biology and category-making, thus undermining Dalit activists who wanted to include caste at the conference.
There is a long history in anthropology of trying to defend the study of cultures on their own terms. In 1947, the American Anthropological Association argued that the drafting committee of Universal Declaration of Human Rights should respect other cultures. Similarly, anthropologists like Claude Levi Strauss and Louis Dumont used global comparisons to address cultural diversity and to avoid using European categories like race to study other cultures. They did not study how such approaches could marginalise problems of oppressed groups in foreign policies, such as India’s Dalits. Nor did these anthropologists take international migration into account, including caste-relations in South Africa or Britain into account.
Historical methods have been more central to postcolonial studies in their attempt of decolonising humanities and social sciences. Dipesh Chakrabarthy’s Provincializing Europe is a case in point. However, although Chakrabarthy brings in minority histories to foreground subaltern pasts, his contribution could create the impression that everyone who is not the coloniser are subalterns. He has no critique of caste as a form of exclusion. Nor does Chakrabarthy refer to the sociology of caste that Ambedkar developed in the interwar period. Ambedkar was not only a prime leader of the untouchables, but he was also an organic scholar who – like Du Bois – was kept outside the academic catalogue. Anthropology of race cannot simply be confined to a critique of colonialism if it should understand how contemporary forms of exclusion operates across cultures.
The politics of caste and race at the time of the WCAR in Durban, South Africa 2001 represents a different starting point to identify how race could be a political concept, which is hegemonized by certain discourses. Historically, India’s official argument connects with the idea of a global colour line and the history of white colonial settlers. India criticised apartheid in South Africa at the time that Du Bois formulated the idea of a global colour line. A central lesson from the international politics of caste and race is nonetheless that while there are several competing discourses, the understanding of race as biology and colonialism may establish a frontier against caste.
How could one take racial discrimination seriously while also developing approaches to acknowledge other forms of exclusion embedded in other cultures, such as caste in India and internationally? For instance, given that Du Bois and Ambedkar were organic scholars who were excluded by mainstream academics, what would have enabled them to be acknowledged as scholars today?
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2016).
Mechanisms of oppression : Dalits and legal development in India.
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2016).
Legal changes in the context of caste-based oppression in India : law, discourse, Dalits.
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2016).
Seeking freedom from caste-based domination in India : Ambedkar, revolts among untouchables and misconceptions of Pariah.
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2016).
Ambedkar’s revolt against caste in India: studying emancipation outside the anthropological
framework of caste and race.
Show summary
The paper sheds critical light on concepts such as outcasts and Pariah in social and political theory,
pointing out how they are incompatible with historical revolts against caste based oppression in India.
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2014).
The event of Tsundur : a massacre of Dalits and the legal disputes.
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2014).
Inequality, Identity and Constitutional Forms among Scheduled Castes in India.
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2014).
Louis Dumont and Max Weber on Caste.
-
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2013).
Dr. Ambedkar, a symbolic type and the Dalit movement in India.
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2013).
Caste, sovereignty and race : keeping Durban away from India.
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2012).
Madiga Dandora and their demand to sub-categorise a constitutional category.
-
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2012).
Social Inclusion vs. Caste and Race in a Global Perspective: Paradigms at Odds?
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2012).
"The Dalit Mahasabha, Karamchedu and the Creation of a Dalit Subject in Andhra Pradesh".
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2012).
Madiga Dandora and their Demand to Sub-Categorise a Constitutional Category.
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2012).
On the Relation between Political Theory and Political Science: some lessons from my work on the Dalit (India’s "untouchables") question and its significance for political theory and research.
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2012).
Dr. Ambedkar, a symbolic type and the Dalit movement.
-
Berg, Dag-Erik
(2012).
The Dalit Mahasabha, Karamchedu and the creation of a Dalit subject in Andhra Pradesh.
-
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2011).
The Politics of Caste and the Language of Corruption.
-
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2009).
"Virtual Durban, Dalit NGOs and India’s sovereign rejection of the race concept".
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2008).
Chopra, Pran (ed.): The Supreme Court versus the Constitution. A Challenge to Federalism. (New Delhi: Sage Publications 2006).
Nordisk tidsskrift for menneskerettigheter.
ISSN 1503-6480.
26(2),
p. 199–202.
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2007).
Myter om "de kasteløse".
Vårt land.
ISSN 0805-5424.
p. 24–24.
-
Berg, Dag Erik; Børmo, Christian & Fosse, Lars martin
(2007).
Ville ikke dø som en hindu (Dr. Ambedkar).
Morgenbladet.
ISSN 0805-3847.
p. 20–21.
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2007).
Dalits, movements and the World Conference against Racism 2001.
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2007).
Dalitenes situasjon: Kaste, hierarki og demokrati.
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2007).
Kaste, menneskerettigheter og dalitpolitikken i India.
-
Gressgård, Randi & Berg, Dag Erik
(2006).
Likhetens paradokser. Hva kan Norge lære av India?
Ny tid.
ISSN 0803-3498.
p. 42–44.
-
Gressgård, Randi & Berg, Dag Erik
(2006).
Hva kan Norge lære av India?
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2006).
Hva Norge kan lære av India.
Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.).
ISSN 0804-3116.
-
-
Berg, Dag Erik & Gressgård, Randi
(2006).
Likhetens paradokser. Hva kan Norge lære av India?
Ny tid.
ISSN 0803-3498.
54(49),
p. 42–44.
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2006).
Modern Sovereignties and the Use of the World Conference Against Racism 2001 by a Dalit Human Rights Campaign to Raisethe Issue of Caste Discrimination in India.
-
Berg, Dag Erik & Gressgård, Randi
(2006).
Hvilke likheter og forskjeller er det mellom Norge og India når det gjelder minoritetspolitiske utfordringer i dag?
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2005).
Tsunamien og de kasteløse.
Dagbladet.
ISSN 0805-3766.
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2005).
Det skjulte apartheid?
Morgenbladet.
ISSN 0805-3847.
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2005).
Kaste, diskriminering og kirke.
Vårt land.
ISSN 0805-5424.
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2005).
Politics in the making and unmaking of caste discrimination as a relevant issue in the World Conference against Racism 2001.
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2004).
Dalits in India and Modern Human Rights Discourse.
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2003).
Undertrykkelsen i skyggen av Gandhi.
Morgenbladet.
ISSN 0805-3847.
-
-
-
-
Gakkestad, Mari; Vambheim, Vidar & Berg, Dag Erik
(2006).
Overcoming Caste and Oppression. Dalit activists' understandings of violence and violence reduction in South India.
UiT Norges arktiske universitet.
-
Berg, Dag Erik
(2004).
Caste, Race and Durban. An analysis of a Dalit Human Rights Campaign and the debate in India about the relevance of caste discrimination in the World Conference against Racism in Durban 2001.
Bergen: Department of Administration and Organization theory.